You are here

Watermarks in Aperture 3—Demystified (part 2)

PhotoJoseph's picture
March 4, 2011 - 3:10am

In yesterday’s post, we took a close look at what happens when you use different size watermark files on different size output, and determined that the Scale Watermark feature is essentially useless. (There has to be a reason for it and a way to make it work, but I can’t figure it out. By all means let me know if you have!)

Today, we’ll discuss what size to make your watermark, what stylings to use (and not to use), we’ll create some using Photoshop — as well as using two FREE solutions — and finally of course we’ll set them up in Aperture.

Oh, and there’s a video podcast of the most relavent bits at the end of this post. Enjoy!

Determining size

What we discovered yesterday was that if you make a watermark larger than the output size (for example a watermark that’s 1000 pixels wide and apply it to an 800 pixel wide image), then it will be scaled down to the 800 size. Alternatively if we use something smaller, say 200 pixels wide, it will never be scaled up. This tells us that we can possibly get away with a single watermark size, assuming that our output are all roughly the same size. For example, if you usually output images at 800 for email, 1000 for web, and 1200 for client review, then you could create one at 1000 or so and never look back. And since a good watermark isn’t some huge glaring ugly thing on your photo, I’d argue that a 1000 wide watermark is plenty big for any size output. And keep in mind when I’m saying 1000 wide, I don’t mean 1000 tall as well… more like 100 tall and 1000 wide—and that’s assuming you have something really long to say! Mine, as you’ll see, are around 600 wide.

What do you put in your watermark?

Do you want to just have text, like this?

That file is only 300 pixels wide, and notice that it has a chunk of blank space to the left of it, so the info isn’t crammed up against the left side of the screen (I like my watermarks in the lower left, but that’s of course up to you).

If you want it to say more, the file just gets wider. What you put in there is entirely up to you; a logo, a name, a signature, whatever you like.

But we still need to figure out how to “decorate” it. The above sample works fine on a bright photos, but not so great on a dark one. Here’s the watermark I’ve used in the past, and although it’s not perfect, it works probably 90% of the time.

It’s white text with a subtle shadow around it so it stands off of lighter backgrounds, and it has a thin white stroke around the characters to beef them up a bit (less than the bold font choice for that font did). Yes, this is a little hard to read against really bright photos, but it hasn’t been a problem for me. I would suggest that if you like this style and do produce a lot of bright photos, consider making a second version that is darker; perhaps simple black text with no shadow.

This file is 600 pixels wide by only 23 pixels tall by the way, which means it’s almost never scaled down since it’s really rare I’d output something smaller than 600 wide.

Here’s another approach that will work on a wide variety of images. The idea is that the dark band in the back is a gradient, and it fades out to nothing just past the “.com”. I used to use this style a lot, but I found at times that it didn’t fade off well; it got chunky or somehow ugly. The last thing you want in a watermark is for it to be distracting! But of course, your mileage may vary.

Perhaps you want something a bit more original, like a signature? If you have a Wacom tablet, that’s easy enough to do. If not, you can try using a utility like Autograph by Ten One Design if you have a trackpad; it allows you to use your finger to sign! Pretty cool. Here’s a made-up AE (ApertureExpert) “signature”.

Applied to a photo, that’s actually kinda cool… this is done with the opacity set to 100%. I’d probably make it a bit smaller and play with scaling the opacity back, but I like it!

Tip: if you’re going to do a signature, create it much larger than you need it, then scale it down. It’ll be easier to draw a good signature with a tablet when you have room to work with.

If you’d like to download the PSD files that I use to create the PNGs above, click here.

Where to place them, what opacity to use

There’s no right answer to placement, it just depends on what you want. I’d encourage you to put the watermark subtly around the edge, not big and glaring in the middle. Don’t be this guy…

No one wants to look at that. It will guarantee that your image is never stolen… but will also pretty much guarantee that it will never be looked at, either. So if you truly don’t want anyone, anywhere, to see your work…  ;-)

As far as opacity, that entirely depends on what your mark is to begin with. Keep in mind that you can dial in the opacity on the original file and then apply it at 100% in Aperture. It might be easier to experiment making it solid and then adjusting the opacity in Aperture, but it’s a universal opacity. If you build the opacity in when designing it, you could have some areas lighter than others. More control.

I suppose I should point out at this point that the reason we use PNG files is because they support transparency. That doesn’t just mean a solid object with a nothing background, that actually means that the object itself can be see-through. If you haven’t seen this before, try this out, it’s cool. Tap the keyboard shortcut Command-Shift-4 — your cursor will be come a crosshair. Now, tap the space bar. The cursor becomes a camera. Roll around the screen, and you’ll see whatever window you’re over highlight blue. When you click the mouse, whatever window was blue will be captured as a screenshot—as a .PNG file, and put on the desktop. Go ahead and click on a window. Now, go to the Desktop and open that Screenshot file (it’ll be called something like Screen shot 2011-03-03 at 20.46.11). Double-click it to open in Preview, and you’ll see the window with a soft shadow around it, against a grey background. That shadow is actually transparent, and if you were to take it into Photoshop, you could layer it against other images, and it would look just like it does in the OS. That’s PNG at work—actual transparency within the file. This is why we use it for watermarks. You can build shadows, glows, or any other partially-transparent element into the mark!

Everything above was created in Photoshop. And I know what you’re thinking…

You said no Photoshop!

Yep! And here we go… how do you create a PNG file with transparency without Photoshop? I dug, I tweeted, I got lots of great responses, and two apps stuck out at me. Special thanks to @bradclarkuk and @chimpoko on twitter, who pointed me to Aviary and Seashore, respectively—two apps I’d never heard of before this adventure began.

Aviary is an online solution (software in the cloud), and Seashore is a download. Neither are what I’d call Photoshop killers, but they will get the job done for something this simple. Let’s have a look.

 


 

~ Aviary (HTML 5 Online Photo Editor) ~

Go to Aviary.com and click on Phoenix, the Image Editor. It’ll launch into a new window and load up the software. You’ll need to create an account eventually to save and output your work, but it’s all free.

Creating your file

Once launched, click Start from Scratch and enter a file size. Give yourself some room to move if you’re just going to play; you can always crop down later. I’ll create a 600 x 50 pixel canvas and try to recreate the watermark you saw above. Be sure to set your background to Transparent.

Tip: If you’re using the Chrome browser, you can set the browser to Full Screen mode and refresh the Phoenix page, and have a full-screen image editor. Pretty cool!

Keep in mind I’ve spent about 10 minutes in Aviary/Phoenix now, so there may be easier or better ways to do this, but here’s what I was able to do pretty quickly.

Adding text

Select the Text tool, which amazingly displays all the fonts installed in your system, click on the canvas and start typing. You can adjust size and color at any time (I changed mine to white, not yet done in this screenshot).

The layers palette in the top right shows you the text and your original transparent layer. I’d suggest duplicating the text layer once you’re satisfied, because once you add a shadow it will bitmap the text and you’ll have to start over if you want to change something. The duplicate command is under the Options button at the bottom of the Layers palette. Here’s the palette with a duplicated text layer:

You may have noticed that the Untitled-1 layer (that was transparent) is filled with grey. To do that, select a color at the bottom left color palette, and grab the paint bucket icon, select that layer and click in it. It’s a good idea to have something there when creating your shadow so you can see what it really looks like; just don’t forget to hide it before you export your PNG.

Adding a shadow

Now to add the shadow, with the text layer selected, click the (ƒ) button at the bottom of the layers palette.

That will warn you that it has to convert to a bitmap to add any effects—which is why you duplicated the text layer before doing this.

Unfortunately the controls here aren’t great. 

Set the quality to high as that does make a significant difference. I’d like to scale back the strength less than 1, but you can only go from 0 to 1 and higher, no in-between. I blurred it only 2 pixels and set the distance to 2, which was reasonable. You could make the shadow grey instead of black; that might help to make it look less dramatic. I left the settings as you see in the screenshot above.

Once done, save the file (you’ll need to create an account now if you haven’t already). Saving happens on their servers, and you have to save before you can export. Once saved, you’re ready to export a PNG file to your desktop!

Exporting a PNG

Don’t forget to hide the background layer so your shadowed text is against transparency, then select Export Image from the File menu.

Choose PNG, and click Generate Image. It will look like it needs to wait a while, but it’ll be done instantly and be ready for you to click the Download button. That’s it!

The result

Here’s the file I created in Aviary Phoenix (empty space cropped to fit in this column, but the text hasn’t been touched):

Not too bad! It’s not as smooth as the Photoshop file however. The rendering from text to bitmap wasn’t handled terribly well, but again I only did this once at this size. You may want to try creating it larger and scaling it down, or perhaps other fonts will render better. But for a free online app, this is pretty spectacular!

 


 

~ Seashore (open source software) ~

This app is a free, open source application from seashore.sourceforge.net based on the GIMP standards. Unlike GIMP, the interface is considerably more Mac-like.

Creating your file

When you launch the app you’ll get the new document window. Pretty straight-forward, and don’t forget transparency.

Adding text

This is a little curious, to be honest. As far as I can tell, you can’t edit the text once it goes down. It appears to be rasterized (converted to pixels) the moment you click the Add button.

You have to choose your color before selecting the text tool, so do that first—click the color palette in the top right corner of the interface and pick your color. Click the T icon to open the text editor, and type in your text. Clicking Change Font… will bring up the OS Font chooser, which is also where you can change the size. To move it, click the Move… button, then nudge it with your keyboard arrows. And yes, the text box really is super transparent the whole time.

Remember you can also add a background to view your text against (already done above). Click the (+) at the bottom left to make a new layer, pick a color at the top right, and use the paint bucket to fill the empty layer.

Adding a shadow

This gets a little tricker; very Photoshop old-skool. Unless I’m missing it (entirely possible), there are no drop shadow tools (or bevel, or glow, etc.) at all. But what you can do is re-create the text layer — in black — then blur it. Here we go.

Repeat the steps you just did to add text, but set the color to black first (before you open the text tool, remember). Move it around so it’s barely offset from the original text, and of course you should be creating this behind the original (but you can rearrange layers if you need to later). Click the screenshot below to open larger if you need to.

Now to blur that lower layer. In the button bar you’ll see a tool that’s an arrow with a blur behind it. Click that, and then you can click Choose Effect from the button that appears, although the one you want (Blur/Motion Blur) is the default. To apply it, you click on the screen twice—the distance and direction between the two clicks defines the blur.

Since you want a very subtle blur, you may wan to zoom in considerably and basically blur it by just one or two pixels. If you don’t like the first attempt, just Command-Z to undo, and click-click again.

If that blur is stronger than you like, you can adjust the transparency of the layer by clicking on the little (i) next to the layer name.

Exporting a PNG

Time to get that PNG output! Of course you can save your file in it’s native format first, just like any other Mac application. Don’t forget to disable the background if you created one (so it’s against transparency again), then just go File > Export and select Portable Network Graphics (PNG) from the options.

And that’s it!

The result

This file is 600 wide and to display it exactly as-is, it’s running off the edge of this screen. You can drag it out to your desktop see the whole thing if you like.

So what do you think? … … … Yeah, me too.

Awful. Could it be better? I sure hope so. If you didn’t do the shadow, maybe it’d be cleaner. I think it’s a bad anti-aliasing job though on rendering the original text. I know it’s small text so it’s harder to do, but this looks too bad to use. By all means, take some time to figure out if you can do better—it’s free software, after all. Or perhaps you create a watermark that doesn’t have a shadow?

Aviary or Seashore?

Not much of a debate here—Aviary Phoenix produced a much better quality file. You do have to be online to use this, and online to get to your original files, but it really is an amazing tool. I’m blown away by what’s being done here, to be honest. Seashore is, to be fair, an open source project that’s listed at version 0.5.1, so not exactly mature. But all that matters here is output, and clearly Aviary is best—but still not as good as Photoshop, so do keep that in mind.

I haven’t compared to Pixelmator, which people love, but it’s a $60 app. Far far cheaper than Photoshop, but for the benefit of you, dear readers, I was looking for a free solution.

 


Let’s put it all together…

Time to go back to Aperture. You have your watermark designed, your PNG file is output, and now you need to get this thing into Aperture. That, fortunately, is the easy part!

Go to the menu Aperture > Presets > Image Export… and the Image Export preset manager will open. If you’ve never played around in here, it’s a wonderful place. This is where you define the size, format, compression, resolution, color profile, and more of the image you will output. If you’re coming from a Photoshop world, where you make this decision (and change these settings) every time you save-as, in Aperture you get to create as many presets for output as you like, and they never change.

Let’s create a brand new one. Select any preset you like, and click the (+) button to duplicate it. It’s convenient to select one similar to what you’ll be creating, but it doesn’t matter.

For this, let’s say we want to create a preset for email, and we want to email watermarked images that are no bigger than 800 x 800 pixels. Select any preset, hit that (+), and change your settings to look like this:

  • Image Format: JPEG
  • Include Metadata: ON (always!)
  • Image Quality: 8 is more than enough for email. 7 is probably fine, too.
  • Size: Fit within: 800 x 800 (this ensures that no matter the width or height or orientation of the original file, at it’s biggest it’ll be 800 pixels)
  • DPI: 72—you only ever need to change this if you’re outputting for print.
  • Gamma & Color Profile can be left at default 

Now for the good stuff…

  • Show Watermark: On!
  • Position: That’s up to you! I usually put mine in the lower left; in this example I’m putting the “signature” in the lower right
  • Opacity: Again this depends on what you’ve created. And you should experiment. You want your mark to be visible, but not annoying or obscuring part of your photo. This example is a solid white watermark with a shadow, so I scaled it back to 60%. It probably could go back farther, as you’ll see in the samples below, but again, that’s up to you.
  • Choose Image…: Click that and choose the watermark file you’ve created!
  • Scale Watermark: OFF!

Click OK, and you’re done. Want to create more presets with the same watermark at other sizes? Just duplicate this one, and make the changes to Size—the rest will stay the same. Just don’t forget that if you make multiple presets with watermarks, and your mark contains the year, that you’ll need to update all of those when the year changes.

How’s it look?

Here’s a few sample outputs using that preset above—click any photo to see it larger.

And there you have it… the same watermark, applied to three different values of photos, and all readable. And in fact I think it could scale back a bit farther, and go quite a bit smaller, but that’s your call.

Wrap it up!

Creating the watermark itself can be tedious, especially if you don’t have Photoshop or something similar. But, as you’ve seen, there are adequate free solutions, and certainly solutions much cheaper than the big P. But no matter what you have, it can be done, and that’s the important bit.

Now’s the hard part—figuring out what YOUR watermark will be! Come up with something you’re particularly proud of? Post it online and link to it in the comments below!

The Podcast

A video version of the most important bits… here ya go!

App:
Apple Aperture
Platform:
macOS
Author:
PhotoJoseph

hi, I’m Alessandro, a photographer from Italy. I LOVE Aperture, it just work perfectly! I’d like to have more functions to edit books but it’s a fantastic App!

about the watermarking you said: “the Scale Watermark feature is essentially useless”
and I think the same. but… maybe that this option scale the image AFTER the watermark is applied?
the usual behavior is that the image is scaled BEFORE the watermark is applied and this function may work differently in this way?!
I still didn’t have the time to try it…

bye and thank you for your work with this great blog!

Alessandro

Thanks for the tip. I have been wondering about doing this for a while.
As for creating a watermark that will be scalled for all sizes of exported images, how about this:
Instead of creating a png file that is the size of your logo, create a png file that is as big as the largest file you you are likely to export. i.e. It could be a large blank page but have your logo in one corner. Because Aperture seems to downsize the watermak correctly then it should scale down the whole png page to any image that you export.
I have not tried this but it is probably worth a try.

Alessandro and Trevor,

If you create a watermark file at the size of the original image then yes it would scale proportionally all the way down. But I think you’d run into a risk of the mark becoming too small on small output—this makes sense for printing, but not necessarily for on-screen viewing.

Creating a blank canvas the size of your largest possible output does make sense, although I’m not sure it’s necessary—but it would get it smaller if you wanted a broader range of sizes off a single watermark. It’s worth a try.

-Joseph @ApertureExpert

@PhotoJoseph
— Have you signed up for the mailing list?

(Lets see if it work better this time, tried to post/move it here last time to but it seems the comment system got upset then.)

For me the Scale watermark is perfectly logical.

It asks if the watermark should be scaled with the image export scale.

If you export the image as original size the WM keep its original size.

If you scale down the image without scale WM checked the WM keeps its size,
if it’s checked it scales down or up the WM with the image.

At least that is how it seems to work for me.

OK. I have tried what I suggested and it seems to work.
If you have created a page with your logo in the Lower Left then when you export to JPG then make sure you have aligned the watermark with Lower Left. If you have created a page with your logo in the Top Left then make sure you have aligned the watermark with Top Left. etc. This is important if you have cropped your image to a different aspect ratio but not a problem if not cropped or aspect ratio remains the same.
It is also probably worth making a Landscape and a Portrait format Watermark png and using the relevent one for exporting or the resulting logo will alter in size a bit.

Trevor,

So you created a watermark on a file that’s the same size as your original photo? And then turned scaling on, and output that? Is’t the mark REALLY small though on a small output (i.e. 800 pixels)?

I feel like I’m missing something in your explanation…

-Joseph @ApertureExpert

@PhotoJoseph
— Have you signed up for the mailing list?

Peter,

The watermark will never scale up, only down—that’s the first thing.

Second, it will scale down even if you don’t select scaling. Per the tests I ran in Part 1 of this story, if you make a watermark at 1000 pixels wide and yet output an 800 pixel wide image, the mark WILL scale down.

The only thing I got out of turning scaling on was an unbearably small watermark.

However Trevor is experimenting and it sounds like he’s on to something. He’s creating a watermark file (mostly transparent) at the size of the original image, and turning scaling on. However I’m not sure that it makes a difference—I think even with scaling off, if the PNG file is the same size as the original photo, it’s going to be scaled down regardless.

By all means test away, and post result here. I spent two days on this myself—it’s a bizarrely over-complicated topic!

-Joseph @ApertureExpert

@PhotoJoseph
— Have you signed up for the mailing list?

Ok I put up som example images here
https://www.dropbox.com/gallery/5725333/1/Watermark?h=0211a4

The base image original size is 2000x2000 pixels the watermark is 500x500 72dpi.

Draw your own conclusions.

I have only used percentage scaling 50%, 100% and 150%

When I have scaling checked on the watermark it retains the same relative size, if it’s unchecked it is fixed at 500x500.
It would probably shrink to fit if it was wider then the image it is supposed to mark.

Peter,

Where are you setting “percentage scaling 50%, 100% and 150%”?

-Joseph @ApertureExpert

@PhotoJoseph
— Have you signed up for the mailing list?

Joseph,

OK what I did was:
Take a full size uncropped (landscape) image in Aperure and exported it as a full size jpeg.
Imported that jpeg into CS5.
Created another transparent layer.
Typed in some copyright text in the Lower Left corner of the image the size that I would like it to be on that image.
Deleted the original background layer.
Saved the file as a png file.

Now when I export any landscape image from Aperture as a jpeg I put a tick in the box ‘Show Watermark’ and select the watermark file that I just created. Position = Lower Left (The position should be the same as where you placed the text in your watermark png image), and ‘Scale Watermark is left unticked.
It does not matter what size jpeg I choose to export, they all have the correct size watermark in the correct position.

I have tried a few and it seems to work for me.

As I mentioned earlier, it will also be necessary to create a portrait watermark file and possibly a square one for use with square cropped images. Once you have Portrait, Landscape, and Square watermark png files just use the one that is the closest match to your image orientation. And to repeat myself, it is also necessary to choose the position to be the same as the positioning of the text within your watermark file.

Joseph,

Thanks so much for doing the legwork and putting it all together. I’ve wanted to use a watermark for a while now but had given up hope because I’m Photoshop-less. Not only have you given us the tools but shown us step-by-step. Once again, Photoshop Expert to the rescue!

I look forward to being able to finally incorporate watermarks into my photo work. Thanks again.

Kathryn

Trevor,

Thanks for giving that a try. The results are logical. I question however why it’s necessary to select the position of the watermark—if the file matches the size, and Aperture will always scale down even if you don’t select “scale”, then it should match the position regardless of what position is chosen in the settings.

The result you’re geting is (or at least should be) such that the watermark is always in the same proportion to the image, correct? In your full-size starting point, if the watermark was taking up let’s say 10% of the image then no matter what size you export, it should still be at 10%, correct?

As you’ve pointed out however, you will probably need to have multiple version of the watermark. I stand by my original assessment then, which is that watermarks are usually only added to images you’ll be putting online, so the size is pretty limited (somewhere around 800 to 1200-ish pixels most likely), and so a single watermark that fits in that range should be sufficient for any use. One mark is always easier to manage than three (especially when it comes time to update the year).

Thanks again for experimenting. I love it!

-Joseph @ApertureExpert

@PhotoJoseph
— Have you signed up for the mailing list?

Kathryn,

Thanks so much for the kind words. I’m glad I was able to offer a solution!

-Joseph @ApertureExpert

@PhotoJoseph
— Have you signed up for the mailing list?

The reason I suggested setting the position was in case the image had been cropped to give a slightly different aspect ratio from the original. This is to make sure that the watermark text lines up correctly with the corner of the image that ws required. As you quite rightly say, if the image stays the same aspect ration then the positioning (using my method) does not matter.
Anyway, thanks again for giving us the information that has enabled me to experiment with techniques.

I’ve been doing some more experimenting.

It seems the watermarking do not take the dpi setting into consideration only the actual pixelsize.

If you have scale watermark checked the watermark image will be applied before the image you are exporting is rescaled.
If it is unchecked the watermark image will be applied after the base image is rescaled.

With the additional criteria that the watermark image is rescaled to fit within the base image if it is larger.

Trevor,

ah, of course. Logical.

thanks again
-Joseph @ApertureExpert

@PhotoJoseph
— Have you signed up for the mailing list?

Peter,

That makes perfect sense. I had to read it a few times, but yes, I get it now. Fantastic. Gold stars to you. I’ll update the tip entry!

-Joseph @ApertureExpert

@PhotoJoseph
— Have you signed up for the mailing list?

Thanks Joseph for a through exposé of watermarking as it stands in Aperture today. I don’t have access to Photoshop, and had spent time using Paint.NET (Win – does not seem to be an OSX equivalent as good) to try and create a watermark … but the drop shadow as per your post is the magic I was missing … and I can’t work out how to do this in Paint.NET … so your www.aviary.com tip was very useful.

FYI, I have today submitted the following suggestion to Apple (http://www.apple.com/feedback/aperture.html, via ‘Aperture [menu]/ Provide Aperture Feedback’).

I can see the value in the watermarking feature (‘File [menu]/ Export/ Versions/ Add Watermark’) supporting the use of image files as watermarks (for logos, graphics and total flexibility etc.).
However, the ability to nominate ‘custom text’ OR an image file would be tremendously flexible. See Google’s Picasa for an example of this: ‘Picasa (for Mac) [menu]/ Preferences/ Web Albums/ Add a watermark for all photo uploads’. It allows the user to specify text (no option to use an image) that is then applied as a watermark. It goes bottom right (no options); it determines it’s own [very appropriate] scale (no options); and magically, it uses black, white and/ or drop shadows differently for each image it’s applied to, depending on the background of that image.
So, if all I want to do is use text for my watermark, and if I’d much prefer the system to determine the scale and readability of that watermark ‘as if by magic’, adding this to Aperture in addition to the current feature would be a great value add.

If anyone else feels it would be a useful suggestion, can I suggest you submit too, in the same way. Weight of numbers I’m sure influences development priorities.

Rgds

Steve (new to both Mac and Aperture!)

Further to my post above, I have two sample images at https://picasaweb.google.com/steve.m.jackson/TestWatermarks

One shows a Picasa applied watermark: “Uploaded via Picasa (for Mac) from 3.6Mb 4320x2868 JPG file, using Picasa’s ‘1600 pixel size’ setting, and letting Picasa apply a watermark using the text ‘© Steve M Jackson’. Result is 219Kb 1600x1063 image, with watermark in black text with white drop shadow (Picasa will use black or white depending on background).”

The other shows an Aperture applied watermark: “Uploaded via Picasa (for Mac) from 205Kb 1600x1063 JPG file (Aperture export as 72 dpi fit within 1600, quality 5 using PNG Watermark image white text, grey drop shadow), using Picasa’s ‘Original size’ setting. Result is image file with unchanged dimensions or file size, with white text watermark not as visible due to the light background).”

Rgds

Steve

Joseph,

Thanks for this tutorial. It is really well done, and makes managing watermarks in Aperture completely understandable.

Can you add the file that you said works about 90% of the time to your download of sample watermarks?

Thanks -

Dudley

Dudley Warner
WARNER Photography

Dudley,

The file is already there. Scroll up and look for “If you’d like to download the PSD files that I use to create the PNGs above…”. There’s a link to download a zip with the PSD inside.

-Joseph @ApertureExpert

@PhotoJoseph
— Have you signed up for the mailing list?

Joseph,

Great tutorial; it really helps! I’ve followed your steps and uploaded the PDF file to the watermark image spot on the window. I’ve added the file to the various spots for watermarks, but it doesn’t appear once I’ve exported the file to Facebook or to email. Please help? Thanks!

Bob,

Do you see the watermark when you export using a preset that you’ve added the watermark to? Remember, Aperture uses Export presets, and you have to add the watermark to the one(s) that you want to have a watermark on.

The Aperture Facebook integration does NOT use any export preset, so there’s no way to watermark photos you upload to Facebook without using a 3rd party plugin (unfortunately).

The email button uses any Export preset you want to set, and you have to set that in the Preferences: [screenshot].

-Joseph

@PhotoJoseph
— Have you signed up for the mailing list?

You can also use Preview to create a watermark or copyright notice, and it too is free and comes with every version of OS X.

It seems Aviary have changed their business direction and are no longer supporting the web-based editor. Pity.

Help !!!!!! I have been working on this for over 8 hours now - trying to replicate your AE logo in Pixelmator. I cannot for the life of me get this to work. I don’t know if it is the stroke setting or the drop shadow, but I simply can’t make this work !

I don’t mean to be pushy but do you think you might find time to download the Pixelmator demo and give it a shot in there ??!! 

I have moved across from LR and the options for watermarks in Aperture really do suck compared to LR

 

This may seem like a silly question but if I put the watermark on my pictures and then export them to my website.  I understand that people will view them this way.  When they buy the picture, does the watermark automatically come off?

SuzieQ

You may login with either your assigned username or your e-mail address.
Passwords are case-sensitive - Forgot your password?